SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Samuel GOUGEON Samuel GOUGEON
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D

Hi,

Please find attached a simple proposal aiming to add an optional
Z input parameter to the existing
& already 3D-enable xarrows() function.
No back-compatibility issue is expected.

Regards
Samuel

SEP_069_xarrows_Z_argin.odt (25K) Download Attachment
Serge Steer-2 Serge Steer-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D

Le 01/09/2011 01:31, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
Hi,

Please find attached a simple proposal aiming to add an optional
Z input parameter to the existing
& already 3D-enable xarrows() function.
No back-compatibility issue is expected.

Regards
Samuel
Tout à fait bonne proposition. On pourrait aussi traiter de meme la fonction xstring...

Serge
sylvestre sylvestre
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D

In reply to this post by Samuel GOUGEON
Le jeudi 01 septembre 2011 à 01:31 +0200, Samuel Gougeon a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached a simple proposal aiming to add an optional
> Z input parameter to the existing & already 3D-enable xarrows()
> function.
> No back-compatibility issue is expected.
For the record (even if it is the document):
http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9859
http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9890

Otherwise, I like the idea. Don't forget to strongly check the backward
compatibility.

Sylvestre


Samuel GOUGEON Samuel GOUGEON
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: SEP 69 : xarrows() with a optional Z paramer for 3D

In reply to this post by Serge Steer-2
Le 01/09/2011 12:31, Serge Steer a écrit :
Tout à fait bonne proposition. On pourrait aussi traiter de meme la fonction xstring...
Not at as easy as for xarrows() : extending  xstring(x,y,str,[angle,box])
to 3D would need also to extend its optional orientation (so with 2 angles instead of 1).
There are graphical bugs of that kind but much simpler and that expect processing.

But this should be another thread.

Samuel