Scilab 5.1.1 and GLIBC

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
mottelet mottelet
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Scilab 5.1.1 and GLIBC

Hi.

I thought the strict dependence should be fixed with this release,
but the problem still remains :

bash-3.00$ /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab
/usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab-bin: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version
`GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
/usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/lib/scilab/libscifileio.so.5)
/usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab-bin: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version
`GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
/usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/lib/scilab/libscimetanet.so.5)
/usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab-bin: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version
`GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
/usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/lib/scilab/libscispreadsheet.so.5)

I cannot give Scilab a try on our server (not so old Linux/CentOS dist,
2.6.9-55 Kernel, GLIBC_2.3.4).

S.

sylvestre sylvestre
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Scilab 5.1.1 and GLIBC

Le jeudi 07 mai 2009 à 14:26 +0200, StŽéphane Mottelet a écrit :

> Hi.
>
> I thought the strict dependence should be fixed with this release,
> but the problem still remains :
>
> bash-3.00$ /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab
> /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab-bin: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version
> `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
> /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/lib/scilab/libscifileio.so.5)
> /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab-bin: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version
> `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
> /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/lib/scilab/libscimetanet.so.5)
> /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/bin/scilab-bin: /lib64/tls/libc.so.6: version
> `GLIBC_2.4' not found (required by
> /usr/local/scilab-5.1.1/lib/scilab/libscispreadsheet.so.5)
>
> I cannot give Scilab a try on our server (not so old Linux/CentOS dist,
> 2.6.9-55 Kernel, GLIBC_2.3.4).
I believe that I fixed this issue in the current nightly build of
Scilab.

http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3131
If you are interested to understand the reason of this issue, read
comment #24.

S