Quantcast

[Scilab-users] IPCV & sciCV

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
2 messages Options
der_Phil der_Phil
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

[Scilab-users] IPCV & sciCV

Hi developers,

am I to wrong to ask if the aim for IPCV and sciCV is the same?

Both toolboxes are quite welcome, but some confusion might occur if both toolboxes are installed.

In fact, some functions are already named the same...e.g.: imread, imwrite

imread in sciCV can have flags, in IPCV it can not.

...just to mention.

I am about to ask, if it wouldn't make sence to combine the efforts, and create only one powerful toolbox enabling openCV functionality to Scilab.
but...maybe there are good reasons for not doing so...


Best Regards,
Philipp

_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Tan Chin Luh-2 Tan Chin Luh-2
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: IPCV & sciCV

Hi Philipp,

I believe all the developers (not just image and vision) are working on their topics for weeks, months or even years before the release of a module to public. It is good that we have atoms portal so that we could know who else working on the same fields and exchange ideas from there.

As for the aim for the modules, I believe all the modules should have the same ultimate aim: to make a good image processing and computer vision tools for Scilab, and possibly, replace Matlab. :)

From my opinion, the crash of the function name are quite common, for example, imshow in sip using scilab graphic, using tcl/tk in sivp, using both in IPCV, and using OpenCV highgui in sciCV. It depends on how the developers want it to be. For the moment, I disable the atomsAutoload for both modules and load it manually whenever I need to avoid this problem.

As for the combine effort, what I could say is everything is possible with OpenSource. Someday, somehow, Scilab image processing and computer vision shall be taking over Matlab for this. :)

Regards,
Chin Luh



On 25/4/2017 9:44 PM, Philipp Mühlmann wrote:
Hi developers,

am I to wrong to ask if the aim for IPCV and sciCV is the same?

Both toolboxes are quite welcome, but some confusion might occur if both toolboxes are installed.

In fact, some functions are already named the same...e.g.: imread, imwrite

imread in sciCV can have flags, in IPCV it can not.

...just to mention.

I am about to ask, if it wouldn't make sence to combine the efforts, and create only one powerful toolbox enabling openCV functionality to Scilab.
but...maybe there are good reasons for not doing so...


Best Regards,
Philipp


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users



_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Loading...