[Scilab-users] iodelay module => in Scilab

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
1 message Options
Samuel GOUGEON Samuel GOUGEON
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Scilab-users] iodelay module => in Scilab

After http://mailinglists.scilab.org/Scilab-users-Atoms-Modules-tp4041157.html :

-------- Message transféré --------
Date : Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:44:24 +0800
From : Chin Luh Tan [hidden email]
To : Users mailing list for Scilab [hidden email]


Sometimes it is hard to decide whether to continue maintaining an atoms module or not.... So I did "snapshots" of downloads on 9/11/2020 21:44 and 14/12/2020 12:20 respectively to see which modules are in the actual top downloads. 

Still, this is not a fair result, such as IPCV having some "patches" which will increase the download number, and some other factors as well. 

So should IPCV continue to be maintained ...? 

Here's the results. 

Image Processing and Computer Vision Toolbox 4620
CPGE 3176
MinGw toolbox 2946
Arduino 2936
CelestLab 2841
iodelay toolbox 2429


This module is a small one, containing a single iodelay() public function, and only functions --mainly overloads --  in Scilab language, making the module easy to update.
This module is among the ATOMS Best-of noticeably because several other popular modules require it as a dependency. Then iodelay is automatically installed when its "parents" are installed.

This means that when iodelay is not up-to-date, this blocks other modules depending on it to work. This is currently the case : 10 months after the publication of Scilab 6.1.0, the current iodelay version is only for Scilab 6.0.

All these aspects make me thinking that iodelay should be part of Scilab, to be included either in the CACSD or in the signal_processing internal Scilab modules. Then no repackaging and re-publication tasks of the module would be needed anymore for each new Scilab 6.x version.

The iodelay module is currently published under the Cecill license. This looks compatible with the Scilab's license.
To me this inclusion could be proposed in the next Scilab 6.1.1 release. There is no reason to wait more.

Any comment is welcome about this proposal, noticeably from Serge, the iodelay author.

Thanks
Samuel


_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[hidden email]
http://lists.scilab.org/mailman/listinfo/users